domcosentino
Dom Cosentino
domcosentino

The NCAA's standard for penalties is whatever the hell the NCAA decides. Which is precisely the problem. Read more

His reputation aside, you still need proof he meddled here before you make those accusations. Remember, he testified honestly, and there's no evidence he did anything to force anyone to keep anyone quiet. He also was never charged with a crime. Read more

You're mostly right here that the Penn State community isn't complicit. Read more

What's sound about calling out a school's "culture of football" when that "culture" is exactly what the NCAA thrives on, and which is alive and well everywhere else? What about Penn State's behavior with regard to a retired coach—a criminal matter being handled by the courts—was any of the NCAA's business? The Read more

It's one thing to say Paterno should have done more, given his influence. It's something else for the NCAA to accept the findings of a report that says Paterno "repeatedly concealed" Sandusky's behavior, when the evidence for that kind of charge is circumstantial and not proven beyond a doubt. That's what the family Read more

Because to do that it would have had to use the investigative process as required by its bylaws. But it bypassed all of that. Read more

Except that the NCAA has very specific rules when it comes to investigating and meting out punishment. In this case, it bypassed that process. Read more

I think that's what's going to get explained during the program tonight. NBC has posted a clip. Sounds like they're alleging that Penn State was coerced into accepting the NCAA's consent decree, and that some trustees are on board with the Paterno family's suit. Read more

Yep. You're on to me. I'm totally a "Penn State apologist." Read more

Yes! And it was a best-of-three at that point! Who knew?! Read more

They'll still need to win their next 20 without a loss just to reach .500. Read more

Derp. P-E story also said he drove to San Diego, which is 95 miles from Moreno Valley. Fixed. Thanks. Read more

I'd buy that had Shaughnessy presented any proof that there might have been a failed test. But he doesn't. He just creates the suspicion himself out of thin air. It's a stupid premise for a column. Read more