tcraggs22
Tommy Craggs
tcraggs22

Our commenting switch was underway long before Bleacher Report's sale. You're stretching for a conspiracy here. Read more

I didn't say it was. I was just pointing out that it's part of the web-surfing grammar. Read more

They aren't, and they aren't. Scout's honor. Raw pageviews—the kind we rack up from people clicking through slideshows—don't matter as much as unique visitors, anyway. (Mouse over the little flame on this post. You'll see the uniques figure.)

I share this concern, but I'm having a hard time thinking of any antagonist we'd want to bring in for a chat who wouldn't know what he was getting into. Read more

OK, honestly? I like it. I was terrified of the underwater-blindfold-three-dimensional-chess iteration that you saw on Gawker until today. This is much, much better. My biggest concern with the changeover was reconciling the difference between how most of our readers consume the comments/discussion (that is, a quick Read more

It's the same logic as, say, the bookmark bar on Chrome.

Kinja is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful discussion system I've ever known in my life. Read more

The q&a format is actually a lot cleaner now: http://gawker.com/5919375/a-discussion-with-chris-crocker Read more

Yeah, sorry about that. What I said about the +1s in my intro post was wrong. EDITED: I guess I said too much. In any case, +1 to your heart's content. Read more

Maybe he'd like to write something for Deadspin dot com? Read more

"These hand-wringing articles about how this is a symptom of the downfall of American society." Name one. Read more

Most of that post was boilerplate. I linked to the Adweek story because that's where Denton first announced plans to overhaul the commenting system. It wasn't a fuck you. If I wanted to say fuck you to you guys, I'd just say fuck you. Read more